What makes a blog interesting? Or for that matter what makes a person who blogs, take the time to write them? Expression? Passion? Narcacism? I don't know all of the answers and I guess it would depend on an individual's motivation, but I know that something deep down inside of ME likes to share and spread thoughts, ideas and information.
I've always believed that since we are all here for such a short time, we should really spend our life sharing as much of ourselves as we can. Hopefully along the way we can share perspectives and inspire insight in others....hopefully along the way we can help others grow, achieve their goals and the world will become a better place (key sappy violin music)
We don't live forever, but if we can inspire others, we can "live" through them and their efforts.
Seriously...these are the things that go through my mind.
The mind is a funny thing. One of the current (and I gather reoccuring) debates in Communications is around information overload. Now that we are in the information age, is this finally the age where our minds can simply not process the amount of information being thrown at us? Now I assume that this is not the first time such a debate has occurred and I actually think its the wrong question to be discussing.
We may all know and think of our minds as filters that constantly injest, process and dispose of information.
Want to know how my mind reads when I am monitoring media stories?
Blah, Blah...Iraq...Blah Blah....'Poll says'....Blah Blah...Mets win (GO METS!) ...Blah Blah...Oh, retiree shortfall in NJ, this is going to affect me sooner than I think. .. Blah Blah... Social Mdia...2008 campaign...blah blah...'FDA says'...Blah Blah...YouTube aiming to develop a Corporate version for internal company usage? We've been talking about internal viral videos for over a year now and watch this come along and make it a reality quicker than we could do it within our environment......isn't that always the way?...Blah Blah ... value of internal communications and employee engagement... Blah Blah ...
Well, you get the point. In that example I've gone through 200+ headlines and briefs in less than 5 minutes.
I think perhaps we should be giving our minds (and ourselves) a bit more credit, don't you think?
The medium is the message, right? Heard that before? Remember that the "medium" is not simply the invention or channel itself, but rather more broadly defined by an extention of ourselves. And remember that the "message" is not simply content, but the noticeable change brought about as a result of the extention's stimuli.
Bear with me. This is going somewhere...
Mark Federman describes McLuhan's premise well:
We can know the nature and characteristics of anything we conceive or create (medium) by virtue of the changes - often unnoticed and non-obvious changes - that they effect (message.)that constantly injest, process and dispose of information.
So by McLuhan's definition, anything we conceive or create - our thoughts, innovations, communications channels - are "our media," all of which ultimately stem from our minds
Mind -> Medium -> Message
In many ways, this makes logical sense to me. Our minds are the most powerful tool that we can possibly have.
And if we spend more time focusing on people's minds and their motivations (media), and a little less on the channels and the content themselves, the potential outcomes (medium) will become easier to explain and predict for.
Recent Comments